The Court of Federal Constitutional Court of 09.02.2010, as others have commented on the blog on 28/02/2010, the federal government must now until 31/12/2010 that the calculation of the "Hartz IV"-phrases transparent. In particular sentence was made that the needs of children has been estimated without evidence, without any investigation to the special needs of children and adolescents were based. For example, caused by the school attendance requirement had remained completely ignored.
Since then, many have made many sensible and senseless suggestions on how the special Needs of children can meet.
on 18/08/2010 Now, the Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (BMAS), a new educational package for vulnerable children and young people presented. It includes the following key points:
- school basic package : will be funded books, stationery and school bags. 70 percent are at the beginning of the school year and 30 percent for the 2 Half will be paid. Parents must prove, by a receipt that the money was earmarked. Also seeks costs for one-day field trips are taken.
- school and daycare lunch : It should be ensured that needy children and young people whose parents the cost of a lunch at school or kindergarten can not afford to maintain such.
- learning support : If there is in the assessment of teachers need for learning support, can such be requested from the Job Centre or the relevant local authority option.
- culture, sports, accommodations : The future should support the participation of vulnerable children and young people through the Job Center or local option and encouraged werden.
Bei alledem soll die viel diskutierte Bildungskarte dafür sorgen, dass die Leistungen auch tatsächlich bei Kindern und Jugendlichen ankommen.
So unstreitig löblich die nun vom BMAS in Angriff genommenen und vielfarbig bebilderten Vorhaben sind, so sollte doch nicht vergessen werden, dass diese eigentlich längst überfällig waren und auch jetzt erst auf Anmahnung des höchsten deutschen Gerichts erfolgen.
Auch die praktische Umsetzung läßt urgent questions unanswered. For example, emphasizes the presentation of the BMAS , come through the use of education card is no discrimination, since all were in need of children and young people such a card. What life must also be based on such an assessment? It would be not only morally highly questionable, if not received all the children in need such a card, but also a flagrant violation of Article 3 of the Basic Law, the Equal Treatment (of all similar people) orders explicitly. Necessarily, but rather to lie whether discrimination arises from the fact that some of the whole group "children" such a card get and some do not. Since there is hardly a clearer way to make visible to the outside by those in need and who is not, probably for virtually every human being, the discrimination by the use of such a card face are obvious. The fact that the new services will arrive directly at the children and young people, indeed must, should also be in dispute. However, the administrative process to be reconsidered urgently if the adult children and youths from the well-intentioned and necessary benefits is not significantly greater disadvantages in the form of social stigmatization.
also may be curious what kind of culture, sports and vacation programs are supported and encouraged. So far, the media often give the impression that through the education package, a new time had begun, in which everything is now possible for all. So far no one has noticed that most of these tenders cause even by the enormous costs associated equipment? With the current cash situation may be allowed considerable doubt whether the full-bodied follow announcements of cultural and recreational activities for all also appropriate action.
What about the boy who discovered the piano for you? If it is a piano for several thousand Euro receive, so that he can practice every day? Otherwise, that is not a meaningful music education is possible. What about the girls that decide for biathlon as a sport? here the corresponding (security) equipment, together with ammunition will be sponsored for several years? Or are the full-bodied announcements do not mean it and a really interest-oriented selection of recreational opportunities not possible? We will see whether the choice ultimately limited to singing in a choir and swimming ....
0 comments:
Post a Comment