How To Disable Fortiquard?

lowering of living standards for recipients of SGB II benefits?

Ähnliches war zuletzt immer wieder der Presse zu entnehmen, exemplarisch etwa der  Focus-Online-Ausgabe vom 23.07.2010.  Was steckt tatsächlich dahinter ? Die Bundesregierung hat nun  am 23.08.2010  eine  small request of the Group of the Left from 08/04/2010 answered. Accordingly, it is not provided, such as the appropriateness of the size of homes to reduce a sole surviving beneficiary of about 45 sq. ft. to about 25, or the size of homes, depending on the number of people of a community of need rigidly defined. Rather, in line with the jurisprudence of the Federal Social Court, the accommodation costs remain to the local characteristics of housing markets addressed. Scale are the conditions of the lower standards of the respective housing markets. A similar advisory draft is planned for this autumn, so that could replace the regulations in force on the 01.01.2011. After that, it is likely planned to introduce a statute authorizing the municipalities through which local councils can make the regionally appropriate accommodation and heating costs known. In Book II and the exporting country's laws should only be the legal framework.

Julia Roberts In Poka Dots

1, 2 or 3 the next one - or why nonsense by repetition is not better ....

Already on 01/03/2010, this blog has dealt extensively with the proposal of Minister von der Leyen, to do away with the term "Hartz IV". Even then urged that this idea is not only practical, extremely doubtful, but in the Moreover, legal nonsense. One would have thought that the Minister from the experts from their communities would have been noted. That does not seem to have been the case because, as now, from an article in the World Social refer to is, is now a "new" concept to be anchored in Book II. Then inevitably the question arises, however, where should it be related to the "old" concept in the law. "Hartz IV" will be there looking in vain anyway. Moreover, one must have serious doubts whether the general language can be changed by law. At best, Mr. Hartz would have no objection to his name, the negative tone is to be taken ...

If interested in the factual background to "Hartz IV" was reprinted on the local post office from 01.03.2010 ( 1, 2 or 3 - or like a child his name was ) referenced.

Merilyn Sakova Netload

data collection on 'Hartz-IV "receiver

A lawyer in the practice of social justice always "hot" topic is what data can be levied on recipients of benefits under SGB II.
The basic rule applies first § 51b SGB II . Concrete is used in particular in the Rechtsunkundige this standard is not. Now, however, the Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (BMAS) von seiner Verordnungsermächtigung Gebrauch gemacht. Am 13.08.2010 wurde die " Verordnung zur Erhebung der Daten nach § 51 b des Zweiten Buches Sozialgesetzbuch " im Bundesgesetzblatt verkündet. Aus dieser Verordnung ergibt sich nun konkret, welche Daten verarbeitet und gespeichert werden dürfen. Dies sind insbesondere personenbezogene Daten sowie Art und Dauer der gewährten Leistungen, Stellenangebote, Daten zu Eingliederungsmaßnahmen, Art und Höhe angerechneter Einkommen sowie Widerspruchs- und Klageverfahren im Rahmen der Grundsicherung für Arbeitssuchende. Die in der Verordnung abschließende Aufzählung der Daten soll regelmäßig überprüft werden. In Kraft getreten ist die Verordnung am 23.08.2010.

Cydia Cheats For Gpsphone Pokemon Ruby

educational package for children and young people

The Court of Federal Constitutional Court of 09.02.2010, as others have commented on the blog on 28/02/2010, the federal government must now until 31/12/2010 that the calculation of the "Hartz IV"-phrases transparent. In particular sentence was made that the needs of children has been estimated without evidence, without any investigation to the special needs of children and adolescents were based. For example, caused by the school attendance requirement had remained completely ignored.


Since then, many have made many sensible and senseless suggestions on how the special Needs of children can meet.


on 18/08/2010 Now, the Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (BMAS), a new educational package for vulnerable children and young people presented. It includes the following key points:

• school basic package : will be funded books, stationery and school bags. 70 percent are at the beginning of the school year and 30 percent for the 2 Half will be paid. Parents must prove, by a receipt that the money was earmarked. Also seeks costs for one-day field trips are taken.
• school and daycare lunch : It should be ensured that needy children and young people whose parents the cost of a lunch at school or kindergarten can not afford to maintain such.
• learning support : If there is in the assessment of teachers need for learning support, can such be requested from the Job Centre or the relevant local authority option.
• culture, sports, accommodations : The future should support the participation of vulnerable children and young people through the Job Center or local option and encouraged werden.

Bei alledem soll die viel diskutierte Bildungskarte dafür sorgen, dass die Leistungen auch tatsächlich bei Kindern und Jugendlichen ankommen.

So unstreitig löblich die nun vom BMAS in Angriff genommenen und vielfarbig bebilderten Vorhaben   sind, so sollte doch nicht vergessen werden, dass diese eigentlich längst überfällig waren und auch jetzt erst auf Anmahnung des höchsten deutschen Gerichts erfolgen. 

Auch die praktische Umsetzung läßt urgent questions unanswered. For example, emphasizes the presentation of the BMAS , come through the use of education card is no discrimination, since all were in need of children and young people such a card. What life must also be based on such an assessment? It would be not only morally highly questionable, if not received all the children in need such a card, but also a flagrant violation of Article 3 of the Basic Law, the Equal Treatment (of all similar people) orders explicitly. Necessarily, but rather to lie whether discrimination arises from the fact that some of the whole group "children" such a card get and some do not. Since there is hardly a clearer way to make visible to the outside by those in need and who is not, probably for virtually every human being, the discrimination by the use of such a card face are obvious. The fact that the new services will arrive directly at the children and young people, indeed must, should also be in dispute. However, the administrative process to be reconsidered urgently if the adult children and youths from the well-intentioned and necessary benefits is not significantly greater disadvantages in the form of social stigmatization.

also may be curious what kind of culture, sports and vacation programs are supported and encouraged. So far, the media often give the impression that through the education package, a new time had begun, in which everything is now possible for all. So far no one has noticed that most of these tenders cause even by the enormous costs associated equipment? With the current cash situation may be allowed considerable doubt whether the full-bodied follow announcements of cultural and recreational activities for all also appropriate action.

What about the boy who discovered the piano for you? If it is a piano for several thousand Euro receive, so that he can practice every day? Otherwise, that is not a meaningful music education is possible. What about the girls that decide for biathlon as a sport? here the corresponding (security) equipment, together with ammunition will be sponsored for several years? Or are the full-bodied announcements do not mean it and a really interest-oriented selection of recreational opportunities not possible? We will see whether the choice ultimately limited to singing in a choir and swimming ....