Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing 24.06.2010 EU-NEWS menschenrechts-IMF-Kritik At June 2010, the chief of the EU Commission, Mr. Jose Manuel Barroso, has considered loudly, that for the case, that the euro stabilization mechanism was not implemented as planned, such a chaos because of too little liquidity at Greece, Spain, or Portugal might develop, that this might make necessary, that the military takes the power in these countries. This sounds like a threat, regarding the fact, that even the Tagesschau reports, that now at June 2010, the protection against wrongful dismissal at Greece is going to be loosened by means of an emergency ordinance of the President, outflanking the parliament (art. 44 of the Greek constitution). Romania has obliged itself at the 05.02.2010 in art. 10 of the „memorandum of understanding“ with the IMF to emergency ordinances. How far isit from the enforcement of unconstitutional and human rights violating IMF conditions to a military dictatorship ? The human rights activist Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing, who had already filed a constitutional complant (file number 2 BvR 1183/10) at Germany at the 29.05.2010 against the law consenting to the euro stabilization mechanism, has filed a petition to the German parliament at the 21.06.2010 to bring forward the public debate.
Document procedure: AG Bad Schwalbach against Michael Wimmer Berger
Sham judgments and document procedure failed as an integral part of an "unfair" procedure of Article 3, Article 6 and Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and to further international law (cf. also Ipsen Constitutional Law II, RN 61 +65 model / Creifelds 2000.332 et seq, UN Resulotion 217 A (III), Charter of Paris. see a. Palandt to gross violations of § 839 BGB)
sham and sham procedures are in principle judgments serious violations of § § 6 (1) Sections 2 and 3 and § 7 of the International Criminal Code (CCIL), because this kind of heavy psychiatrization the victims of the justice - That victims of state violence to judicial and law enforcement level - as torture measures under Article 2 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 10 evaluate December 1984 (Torture Convention), the CCIL but for the individual attacks but only if he is a member of CCIL in that group - for example, the NGO and the same interest "Ring provision".
In the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment regulates the individual complaints. torture document procedure
note procedure: AG Bad Schwalbach against Michael Wimmer Berger
preliminary I quote from my blog "Broken Rights . If you read this blog, one realizes that this is not one single document procedure but to the Inquisition system Germany.
17:03:09: okay, I have wirlich not great I feel like with this thing deal deeper, because I'm air »continue daily psychological torture including by the judiciary arranged and not look back that's what helps me most, so following this: a joachim snackers, with the support of the judiciary poisoned my cat and I gave him curved to date, no hair. so I can support to witnesses, the court did not allow the bad in over five years Schwalbach, it relies ... the court knows the course well, so got the snacks at that time as plaintiffs also asked lawyers in contrast to me. Germany is now using for over five years to let this thing take me to my life ...
20:03:09: before I of the next part: the proposed police reports again, I am now but this part of the judiciary and the cat killer describe in more detail: the judiciary and the cat killer end of 2002, I was out of the once again wrongly dismounted sentence dismissed. I looked for an apartment in Taunton / labor. shortly after I had moved to nisstete joachim snackers, who also had an apartment in the same house, a more or less me. He sat day and night with me in the apartment while I was working on pc. He had no friends or something similar. I noticed quite quickly that he acted as an informant now smaller, but I was actually much any more. However, I had to do something else. I helped out in a restaurant offered free of charge and set up an Internet cafe. meanwhile arrived at my apartment, I wanted to be alone sometimes. I had to bite the öffters approximately 4-5 clock in the morning but his request to go flat, I also must sleep sometime. not fit him at all. I had a little cat, all the freedoms enjoyed what means they could come and go as and where they wanted etc. I noticed that the animals with non-snackers had the hat, but he probably noticed that I the cat was significant. evening when I came home, she was mostly already there, waiting for me or she was in the garden. when I called her from the patio door, she came immediately. after I now more and more in the internet-cafe and restaurant to do, had limited daily contact be spied upon and look of the snack to a minimum. him it was wrong, that I also other "friends" and had a visit from a friend received from Koblenz, etc.. one evening I came home and my cat was not there. I called and searched her, but she was nowhere to be found. I also asked for my neighbors and thomas heike that liked my cat, and they left their well öffters Wonung after. But even there, she was not. she came the whole night not only the next afternoon she was back. two days later, the game repeats itself and another neighbor, Ruth sieve, in the upper floor of the house lived told me that the snackers with my cat she had visited. I am encouraged to, because now everything was clear and I think that the snackers had my cat at night locked up with him. the snackers was not at home, but then in the evening already. I walked through the garden on a ladder that we always use his balcony door and knocked. He opened the door. his apartment was cluttered with scrap metal and old computers. We were bunk bed before his self built that only a narrow had access, as the left and right, everything was obstructed with rubbish when I told him clearly said that his finger should leave cat of mine and when he again brings with him, we would have a problem. then he made me laugh a cheeky answer, something like that I could do about it eh nothing. then I grabbed the long miserable (he was not satisfied with very thin to thin and rather long bzw.gross) at its shirt and wanted to threaten him, nevertheless, before I could say anything he let himself like a wet sack and cried, help, help. He was lying on the floor and I had his shirt still in hand. I braked so well from his staged fall. I raised my hand and clenched his fist and said to others: if you Häll not the flap, cut I really. then he stopped and no more screaming. I ran in, and set out immediately from the spinner out away from the balcony door. I wanted to go down the ladder when he came back and said that he's sorry and he handed me a small piece of hashish in the hand and said come on you a smoke. Ruth sieve, which had its balcony and scream about it from his help- became attentive, listened from their balcony and got with it. two days later I saw him with a bandage around his arm. I counted together 1 and 1 and was told then by the ruth that the snackers told, I had hit him. it was clear that the snackers are no longer with me came in the apartment. He was hardly seen. I got a subpoena for the ag badschwalbach. I took a written statement of Ruth and another witness (an ex-officer), was also the roommate of the house with. arrived at the court hearing, sat there a snack that also lived on Benefactor, with one, unlike me, the court assigned a lawyer. The judge threw me to have beaten before the snackers. what you just accused me and how I came to be not heard. I tried to presenti my presentation, but that was not possible. The judge and lawyer had nothing else to do than laugh at me and show me, that's what I say ule. schriftl. the message of the seventh ruth she would not accept my evidence and did not let them enter because they would not need him, she said. stupid farther to laugh I got up and said if I did not always right, then you can make the negotiations even without me and left. The officer got upset and went into the courtroom and told the judge that he ' and he had never seen here as a witness and therefore would be to say what would have ... we went! I got a judicious interim with a disposal, an Indian, I got banned in the near the entrance door to get the snack. the violation of the preprinted penalty of 5000 € was painted by hand with the hand-written and 200.000 € for it. few days later and struggled scheppte, my cat with me in my apartment and fell more or less to the ground before me. I called my neighbor Thomas, who brought my vet to katzte. but the vet could not help her. she died there. the snacks I saw the following day not more and I decided now Germany final to leave and called the judge had to bathe in and told her so with or, more precisely, I told her that I was going to leave Holland. she said that we would indeed live in a free Europe and not to the contrary would. I duly reported to the police from Taunton, and left as far as I can remember on 20/03/2004 19.oder the country. The following day I reported to the police in micht suffer / holland ...
We now have 15 June 2010 To this day I am reminded daily of psychologically terrorized Germany and now also to physically amiss. And now a few facts about this tyranny This is the arrest warrant. A Anklakeschrift I do not have access to the file and I will not be granted. I hold: This act that springs from the imagination of sick lawyers, should take effect on 25th June 2003 have taken place. 7 years ago In April 2004, immediately after my provoked by the German government and the court agreed to leave in Wiesbaden, West Germany issued two arrest warrants issued against me. A result of the alleged assault and the other alleged grounds of residence determination. I firmly believe: I am in the European Union have been consistently reported to the police and the present Zeipunk'm still in Spain and then reported to the police in Germany.
If the assault would agree that it does not then it would be barred under 5 years. Furthermore, I would have got from top awarded to a public defender. The facts are quite different: I firmly believe: The plaintiffs, the welfare derived by a government-funded Rechtsanwaeltin is approved. This we have handled in the same thing even before over 6 years now. The accused, that is me, a rule of law guaranteed by the mandatory defense denied. Ich zitiere: Weder die Schwerde der Tat noch die Schwierigkeit der Sach- und rechtslage lassen die Mitwirkung eines Verdeidigers geboten erscheinen. Insbesondere ergibt sich angesichts des Zeitablaufs keine Straferwartung, die eine Beiordnung wegen Schwere der Tat begruendete. Wenn dieses nun so waere, dann frage ich mich was der Haftbefehl sollte. Von dem ganzen Staatsterror gar nicht erst zu reden. Uebrigens als ich Karfreitag diesen Jahres von dem Deutschen Zoll verhaftet wurde, nachdem die Schweizer Polizei mich auch sicher dort abgegeben hatte. Wurde mir der Pflichtverteidiger zugelassen. Den durfte ich dann auch am 5. Tag der Haft anrufen. Ich kam "frei" und verpflichtete mich in Deutschland zu bleiben. Now I pursued since Easter of this terrorist state and its little abortion at every turn and terrorized. This dirty work had in the past 7 years, the Dutchman, do the French, English, Portuguese and even the Swiss. this ZIP letter I received from my now public defender even though he knew I wanted to see the document: time passes - is now the 16th June 2010
Yesterday I had phoned my "lawyer" and explains the tips, after they had said to me that the RA is in the conversation and I would be recalled that I was not on the court, on the 23rd of June set appear to be going, I consider this trial as inadmissible. Today called me back and the RA refused a corresponding letter with performances of the corresponding end section of the court or competent judges write. the contrary, he threatened me so that I would be arrested, as was the case a few years ago when I the court in writing informing him that I would have learned myself from criminals away and therefore will not appear voluntarily to the court would. thus ending the talk of the RA.
time goes by - today is 23 June 2010 As it stands now I am represented by a different Rechtsanwaeltin. When she called yesterday on the court, they told her that the hearing does not occur, at least not today. This I learned then from the Rechtsanwaeltin who called me then. The court told me not to ...
time passes and the wickedness of the German government continues to develop.
note procedure: LG Wiesbaden against Michael Wimmer Berger
I received the following letter from the AG Bad Schwalbach: So the mock trials of the terrorist-GmbH-Germany will now take place on the LG in Wiesbaden. A charge of LG, as I heard the opinion also, I did not get to this day. Meanwhile bekam ich zwei weitere Strafanzeigen, natuerlich wegen Gewaltdelikten, - um der Linie treu zu bleiben. Tatsache ist, dass ich keine Straftat begangen habe, weiterhin Staatsterror an mir vollstreckt wird und ich mehrfach von bewaffneter Polizei, die nun hier das Haus in dem ich terrorisiert werde oefter besucht, koerperlich bedroht wurde und einmal sogar attackiert wurde. Die illegale Gerichtverhandlung soll nun am Donnerstag, den 19. August 2010 auf dem LG in Wiesbaden stattfinden... Das Scheinverfahren vom 19.08.2010 auf dem LG in Wiesbaden
Auf dem Gericht angekommen erfuhr ich, dass es eine Verhandlung des Amtsgerichts ist und nur aus technischen Gruenden auf dem LG stattfindet, da der Zeuge (bzw. Taeter) Monitor and afraid about being questioned.
I was represented by a lawyer (behind it) and I had already long been deprived of the authority.
I was not allowed to perform, so this method at all has no legality. I got 2 agenda prison or be fined 100 euros, during the procedure, as I said without being asked and also denounced the illegality of this procedure. The criminal case in which I would if we live in a constitutional state, a witness and would have to be accused is the statute of limitation for a long time. I can prove it, but I also was not allowed. The witnesses, who I stated before about 6.5 years at the same hearing on the AG Bad Schwalbach were not loaded and the written statement by the now deceased witness Ruth sieve is like a miracle from the court files have disappeared or these files were not consulted on purpose. Even the testimony of the true perpetrator was a great laugh and not (currently not more I would like to say that I would lift my blogs for the appeal hearing, to which anyone is welcome. I was 8 months sentenced without parole, even though everyone knew in the courtroom that I am innocent. (as always - nothing new) Until today I did not get a verdict, but the request on threat of arrest already (of course, not signed) I can not even. the name the judge or the Staatsanwaltin know. Not until today. I mention no indictment, and access to the file altogether.
The Social Dusseldorf court has now, in two cases (case no 547/10 AS S 29, S 29 AS 412/10) held that the consortium Make amounts of Hartz IV recipients to private health insurance in the full amount required if a change in the statutory health insurance is not possible, and if the insurance in the private health insurance at the best price. The defendant ARGEN had approved in each case only a grant in the amount of the contribution to the health insurance.
As justification, the SG Dusseldorf § 26 paragraph 2 sentence 2 SGB II approach taken in application. It is the intention of the legislature to ensure the affected full health insurance coverage, without which they would be charged against their will by contributing. "Therefore, in the interests of insurance customers mit denen privat Versicherter vergleichbar. Ansonsten würden nämlich bei den privat Versicherten Beiträge auflaufen, die letztlich nicht hinnehmbar das Existenzminimum gefährden würden.
Die Urteile sind bislang nicht rechtskräftig.
Bestätigt hat diese Auffassung jedoch das Landessozialgericht NRW in einer aktuellen Eilentscheidung , ein der es allerdings zugleich klargestellt hat, dass es Versicherten demgegenüber auch zumutbar ist, innerhalb To change the private health insurance in an offered by this favorable base rate.
on 04.06.2010 have started the authors of "Our policy blog" a new blog specifically for the criticism around the International Monetary Fund and its human rights abuses: http://menschenrechts-imf-kritik.blogspot.com/
criticism started withdrawal of the Federal President, for constitutional complaint against the IMF-Enabling Act?
(Article by Volker Reusing dated 06/03/2010) The official version, Federal President Horst Köhler had resigned mainly because of his statements to the Germany radio from 22.05.2010 in Afghanistan military operations for economic interests, are not convincing. because as President, he has a criminal immunity enjoyed like no other man in our country. Particularly in view a call on the blog "Federal Horst" to denounce him for his statements regarding military operations and economic interests, it would have been much more logical but, if he had the arguments about the complainant (s) are ignored or rejected. But just give up the immunity in the situation seems completely illogical. Military missions interests since the Lisbon Treaty, officially enshrined in Article 42 TEU expressly related to the EU security strategy. The Federal Constitutional Court, the abuse of those provisions in the Lisbon Judgement of 30.06.2009 at least so far limited that it may indeed help to from countries with which we are not allied, are usable but not the war of aggression, because it was guaranteed constitutionally by the Lisbon ruled that in Germany, the peace bid (Article 1 paragraph 2 GG) and the aggressive war prohibitions under Article 26 Basic Law and Article 2 paragraph 4 of UN Charter on any provisions of EU law on the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) are. The statements by the former President of Afghanistan shows that it the results of the Lisbon ruling has apparently not yet fully realized, or that she might not fallen, in part. But he then expressly declared war on anyone, and do not explicitly called for such a war in a very specific case. If he is with his statements in Afghanistan, so unbearable for them many basic law abiding people in Germany may be, has made even punishable, then most likely related to his oath, has since according to Article 56 GG sworn specifically to the Basic Law. Therefore, it would have been much more logical if he had not given immunity. What then could still have been overweight?
Things worth, his speech from 14.05.2010 before the Federal Constitutional Court on the occasion of the ceremony on the adoption of the old and the inauguration of the new President of the Federal Constitutional Court anzusehen. In seiner Rede hat Köhler damals für den „Euro-Stabilisierungsmechanismus“ geworben. Zu dem Zeitpunkt lag der deutsche Gesetzentwurf dafür vom 11.05. 2010 (Bundestagsdrucksache 17/1685) erst seit drei Tagen vor. Am 21.05.2010 wurde er von Bundestag und Bundesrat in einer schwindelerregenden Geschwindigkeit beschlossen. Laut der Rede des Abgeordneten Dr. Jürgen Trittin ohne, dass den Abgeordneten der Text zu dem „Stabilisierungsmechanismus“, dem sie mit dem Gesetz blanko zugestimmt haben, vorgelegen hätte. Die meisten völkerrechtlichen Verträge stehen über den nationalen Gesetzen (Art. 27 Wiener Vertragsrechtskonvention, WVRK), aber unterhalb aller nationalen Verfassungen und auch unterhalb der zum „ius cogens“ gehörenden internationalen Verträge (Uno-Charta, Menschenrechte der Uno und humanitäres Kriegsvölkerrecht) und unterhalb des nicht zur GASP gehörenden EU-Rechts.
Der Ranganspruch des EU-Rechts steht in Konkurrenz zu dem der höchsten Verträge der Uno (Art. 103 Uno-Charta, Art. 28 AEMR, Art. 1 EUV, Art. 51 EUV, Erklärung 17 zum Lissabon-Vertrag).
Wenn nun IWF-Kreditauflagen mit eu-rechtlichem Rang transportiert werden sollen, dann fordert das die Fähigkeit der Menschenrechte der Uno, der Umsetzung dieser Kreditauflagen Grenzen zu setzen, heraus. Und auch die Grundrechte der Verfassungen anderer Euro-Mitgliedsstaaten, in denen die Grundrechte nicht klar über dem EU-Recht stehen, wie am deutlichsten in Irland.
Am 14.05.2010 hat der damalige Bundespräsident vor dem Bundesverfassungs-gericht für dieses Gesetz, welches dem IWF erhebliche zusätzliche Macht geben würde, geworben. Und er hat auf emotionale Weise Druck ausgeübt, nicht übermäßig durch Urteile in die Aufgaben des Gesetzgebers einzugreifen.
Er hat am 14.05.2010 mitten aus einem Interessenkonflikt heraus gehandelt. Denn Horst Köhler ist in den Jahren 2000 bis 2004 geschäftsführender Direktor des IWF gewesen und ist danach in die immunste Position der gesamten Bundesrepublik Deutschland gewechselt. Als Bundespräsident hätte er das Gesetz zu Drucksache 17/1685 von sich aus dem Bundesverfassungsgericht vorlegen müssen bereits angesichts der Blankett-Ermächtigungen zu einem Stabilisierungsmechanismus, dessen Regelungen den Abgeordneten bis heute nicht vorgelegt wurden. Stattdessen warb er rhetorisch trickreich ausgerechnet vor dem Bundesverfassungsgericht in einer Einfluss nehmenden Rede für den Mechanismus. Welche Gedanken er dabei auch may have had, his speech was in keeping with the IMF and the affiliated banks and not in accordance with the Basic Law.
has the constitutional complaint from 29.05.2010 due to him this conflict of interest. And some of the most serious human rights abuses of the IMF highlighted with particular reference to world hunger. According to an official document of the United Nations in 2001, which is cited in the lawsuit, the loan covenants of the IMF and World Bank chief obstacle No. 2 for the right to food in the world together ahead of biotechnology and, above all current wars. And the application cited examples in which the IMF has intensified active or passive hunger in Niger and Brazil, and that fall at least partially time in the office Köhler, so one wonders what he would like back then could have prevented.
The covenants of the International Monetary Fund have demanded so much more to dead, the Afghan war. This is one reason to go.
resignations are just like the politicians Wegloben of a psychological mechanism to remove certain issues from the public eye. Often, smaller, more gentle, scandals advanced. Sometimes there are also agreements to treat no more in return for the withdrawal issues.
It will be interesting to see who may have since met with whom agreements and what in the next time everything will come out through the IMF and its influence on the development of the crisis.
http://sites.google constitutional complaint with source references to the IMF
. com / site / civil rights / human rights € stabilization mechanism video opinion on the constitutional complaint
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dc2mI99lsoM&feature=player_embedded journal to file a constitutional complaint http://unser-politikblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/burgerrechtlerin-legt.html resignation speech of President
human rights activist files complaint against constitutional speculation support mechanism and against supranationalization of IMF conditions
Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing 30.05.2010 (English) (file number of the national Parliament 17 / 1685)
At the 29.05.2010, the human rights activist Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing has filed a constitutional complaint against the law, Which calls itself the "Law for the Adoption von Gewährleistungen im Rahmen eines europäischen Stabilisierungsmechanismus" (law on state guarantees within the framework of a European stability mechanism, file number of the national Parliament 17/1685). The law supports the speculation, instead of slowing it down, because it promises the creditors of the other euro member states, that they will, at the cost of the tax payers, get back more of their credit claims, than they would get otherwise in the case of a national bankruptcy. This fund supports massively the power of the creditors in comparison with the inhabitants of the of the debitor coun-try. It is just not an act of solidarity with the population of the other states, which have just got into solvency difficulties because of over-sized bank preservation funds, but with their creditors, again a huge subventionism with tax payer money for the banks, at the cost of the the social, of the real economy, and even of the ability to work of the states.
The law, in addition to that, contains it its §1 Abs. 1 S. 2 a carte blanche – agreement for the creation of a system, which would be by far more dangerous and painful for the people in the euro zone and in the EU, than a national bankruptcy alone could ever be: It is planned, to transport credit conditions of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to the victim countries with the rank of the EU secondary law.
Ireland is affected even harder, because art. 29 Abs. 4 Nr. 10 of the Irish constitution puts all EU law above the Irish constitution itself, so that Ireland has nearly no protective mechanisms at all against IMF conditions with EU secondary rank – except for possibly leaving the EU.
The IMF may be an independent international organization and as such have the right to draft its conditions independently of the human rights. But that these conditions are implemented even as far as they trample over the limit, which the the national constitutions and the indivisible human rights of the UN are setting, is illegal. According to the view of the plaintiff, it won't take long any more, until in many countries consequences, in terms of liabiliy and of criminal law, will be put through to punish the disregard of the preeminence of the basic rights and of the universal human rights (belonging to the „ius cogens“) above the IMF law.
At Niger, the IMF has prohibited the building of sufficient food reserves, and even amidst the huge starvation catastrophy, the IMF has lobbied against the distribution of millet food aid of the United Nations and of NGOs.
At Brazil, the IMF has not accepted a provisional debt moratorium, so that the Brazilian „fome zero“ program could only get hundred thousands instead of millions out of starvation.
In the 1980ies, cuts into food subventions, ordered by the IMF, have caused hunger riots at Bolivia, Jordan, and Venezuela.
According to a publication of the United Nations on the human right to food (art. 11 UN Social Pact), the credit conditions of IMF and World Bank together are the second-biggest cause world-wide for the hunger, by far more than biotechnology, and also by far more than all wars world-wide together. In 2005, more than 100.000,- people per day have died of starvation, obviously a significant part of them because of the IMF. These numbers remind of homicides, but with the difference, that it is directed against the poorest and not against specific nations.
As a result of the Latvian Constitutional Court of the 22.12.2009, the IMF has become, at least for the moment, a bit more modest at Europe, in the way, that the IMF now is in favour of respectively does not violate the minimum wages and the minimum pensions.
The recent IMF conditions in the „memorandum of understanding“ towards Greece and in to „letter of intent“ of Romania, however, show which way the IMF wants:
-significant cuts into the pensions -significant into the public health insurance -making the the ababondonment of standard wages easier -lifting the honorary system of the freelancers -cuts into the subventions of the real economy (in order to have more money for the banks) -significant cuts into the wages of the public administration -drastic reduction of the personnel of the public administration (for Greece replacement of only 1 of 5 retiring officers, for Romania only 1 of 7; even though at Romania the police is scarce already today)
The „memorandum of understanding“ with Greece proves, that the IMF has demanded of Greece already at January, that 10,- billion € of the first support package, which the German Parliament has consented to at the 07.05.2010 (file number 17/1544), have to be spent not for the Greeks of for their debts, but as a start capital for another Greek bank preservation fund. Last week, the self-declared „system relevant“ banking circles have, in harmony with the EU Commission, demanded that all euro member states together pay additional 350,- billions of € into a preventive banking preservation fund, as e. g. Radio Utopie and taz have reported. The IMF has made exactly this as a condition to Greece already at January. And now the whole connection is getting visible. The new „stabilization mechanism“ would, with a probability close to certainty, also be used to fill up such preventive bank preservation funds, financed by the states, which have to take loans to finance their contribution.
The drastic disconstruction of the personnel of the public administration is on the same line as the Lisbon Treaty (art. 14 TFEU, protocol 26 to the Lisbon Treaty), with the goal to force the states, to have significant parts of their sovereign tasks done by private corporations, up to the de-facto dissolution of the sovereignty of the states, to the degradation of democracy to a facace, to the degradation of law and order to a basis for negotiations.
In addition to that, the IMF is also highly controversial with regard to work the with statistics. Its former employee Davison Budhoo has accused the IMF, that the IMF has intentiously incorrectly analysed data on Trinidad and Tobago, in order to just give the false impression to the country, that it had a crisis, in order to put through the conditions expected by the IMF.
Especially spicy is, that Trinidad and Tobago is, according to a Canadian study, one of the countries, in which the IMF has put through the privatization of parts of the sovereign administration and of the weakening of the civil monopoly on the use of force.
The so-called „Gesetz zur Übernahme von Gewährleistungen im Rahmen eines europäischen Stabilisierungsmechanismus" is the carte blanche – agreement to a „terrible beauty“, which must not be born – in order to preserve for the current and for future generations at Germany and at Europe a life in dignity and an international order, which respects and promotes, to the best of its ability, the sovereignty of the states (art. 2 par. 1 UN Charter) and the chance to fully realize and enjoy the full realization of the universal human rights (art. 28 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights).
Politicians, who give everything away to self-declared „system relevant“ banks, instead of deconcentrating them, until they are small enough, so that they cannot any more endanger the system of the economy and of the state, politicians, who listen to the mightiest banks and corporations, instead of to the constitutional order and to the universal human rights, do not belong into the Parliament.
V.i.S.d.P:
Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing, Thorner Str. 7, 42283 Wuppertal, 0202 / 2502621
Links:
Ankündigung der Verfassungsbeschwerde vom 20.05.2010
Bilderberg press conference at the European Parliament by Daniel Estulin
Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing 06/03/2010
These recordings from the press conference of the EVS Group, Bilderberg will also be posted on this blog, because the "European stabilization mechanism" for even covert banking kenrettung and denationalization simply must be put in place, especially not before the public in general knows what impulses have set the Bilderberg conferences for the financial and economic crisis. It's striking that so specifically against Greece speculate profiled and propagates was just opposite the land where the Bilderbergers had last met. , Funny that suddenly, just shortly after the blanks approval in the Bundestag printed matter 17/1685 everywhere to the question being debated whether there was a English real estate bubble, and at the same time in close to the Bilderberg session in Spain. The question of whether and to what extent discussed at Bilderberg or even decided, will exacerbate crises intentionally, in order to economic interests against the populations and enforce the constitutional order of States, is also given the personal nature of the IMF and Bilderberg urgent need of clarification. As the Canadian journalist Naomi Klein has revealed in her bestseller "The Shock Doctrine", in World Bank circles years ago was discussed, specifically artificial crises exacerbate or even create, to enforce more covenants can. In this context, accused the former IMF employee DAVISION Budhoo the IMF to have forged already in the year 2000, statistics of Trinidad and Tobago. Ironically, this IMF is now gradually
Von Daniel Neun Horst Köhler is effective immediately resigned from his post. In support of his resignation, said Keller, this is done "from a lack of respect for his office," but not by him but by others. Keller had been shown criminal charges including breach of the constitution, after he had brought for a visit to troops at the front in Afghanistan, a war in Germany for economic motives into the conversation.
The former president of the International Monetary Fund was before his first election from the current CDU-Chancellor and the then opposition leader Angela Merkel, FDP chairman Guido Westerwelle and the then-CSU chairman Edmund Stoiber was presented after a long and painful search, in March 2004 as a temporary solution for the office of President now will have to be invited to a new Federal Assembly. The Merkel government-Wester wave of CDU, CSU and FDP is about to collapse. The Berlin Republic is in motion.
civil rights activist before the Federal Constitutional complaint against speculation and promotion mechanism for supra-nationalization of IMF conditions
(Bundestag printed paper 17/1685) Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing, 30.05.2010
on 29.05.2010, the civil rights activist Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing constitutional complaint filed against the law, which itself "Law for the Adoption of Warranties as part of a European stabilization mechanism is called "(Printed Matter 17/1685).
until later this month announced by the President of Ecuador related to write a letter to the Greek head of state, and to explain is how worse the programs of the IMF crisis and the economic livelihood of many people have destroyed.
Many countries, especially in Latin America today are trying to escape from the IMF loans because the world as good as any other legal holders of such covenants are brutal. In Niger, the IMF has prohibited the construction of adequate food reserves and even in the midst of the famine is used against the distribution of relief supplies of millet United Nations and NGOs.
In Brazil, he has rejected a temporary suspension of debt service so that Brazil's "Fome Zero" - program only Hunderttausende statt Millionen aus dem Hunger holen konnte.
In den 1980er Jahren sorgten vom IWF befohlene Kürzungen von Nahrungsmittel- subventionen für Hungerunruhen in Bolivien, Jordanien und Venezuela.
Nach einer Veröffentlichung der Vereinten Nationen zum Menschenrecht auf Nahrung (Art. 11 Uno-Sozialpakt) sind die Kreditauflagen von IWF und Weltbank zusammen der zweitgrößte Grund für den Hunger in der Welt, deutlich vor der Biotechnologie und vor allen Kriegen in der Welt zusammen. In 2005 sind weltweit täglich 100.000,- Menschen verhungert, davon offensicht- lich ein erheblicher Teil durch den IWF. Das sind Größenordnungen, die an Völkermorde erinnern, allerdings mit dem Unterschied, that this is against the poor and not against certain peoples.
Following a decision by the Latvian Constitutional Court of 22.12.2009, the IMF is in Europe at least once a moderate in the way that he can at least currently supported minimum wages and pensions in Europe and untouched.
The current IMF demands in the memorandum of understanding with respect to Greece and the "letter of intent" from Romania, however, show where he wants to go:
-significant cuts in pensions -significant reductions in the VAT. Health Insurance facilitation of the waiver of wages Suspension of Fee scales for freelancers -cuts in subsidies for the real economy (so that more money for the banks as is) -significant pay cuts in public services -drastic reduction in staff in the public service (for Greece only one new officer for 5 outgoing, in Romania another 1 for 7, and while in Romania, the police are just today)
As the memorandum of understanding demonstrated by Greece, the IMF has over Greece demanded in January that 10 - billion € from the first aid package, which Bundestag and Bundesrat approved on 07.05.2010 had (Printed Matter 17/1544) to use not for the Greeks or their debts, but as seed money for another Greek bank rescue fund. Last week, have changed the selbsternann- ten "systemically important" banking circles in line with the EU Commission GeFor, such as radio utopia and the reported taz, that all euro Member States again in addition together 350 - billion € for preventive bank rescue fund to pay. That was exactly what the IMF Greece in January for the rest. And only now the whole connection is visible. The new stabilization mechanism "would almost certainly also likely to fill such preventive Bank rescue funds used on credit. The drastic downsizing
in the public sector is on the same line as the Lisbon Treaty (article 14 FEU Treaty, Protocol 26 to the Lisbon Treaty) allow to force the states, significant parts of their sovereign functions run by private corporations to towards the de facto dissolution of the sovereignty of States, the degradation of democracy to a mere facade, to the degradation of law and a mere negotiation.
is also the IMF in dealing with statistics is highly controversial. His former employees Davison Budhoo accused him of having evaluated data for Trinidad and Tobago falsely to the Country in the first place to convince, it would have a crisis, and thus to enforce the conditions required by the IMF can.
is especially piquant that Trinidad and Tobago, according to a Canadian study, one of the countries in which the IMF, the privatization of parts of the regulatory administration, and thus was able to impose a softening of the civil power monopoly.
The so-called "Law for the acquisition of warranties as part of a European stabilization mechanism" The forms approval to a "terrible beauty" that is not to be born - so that the current and future generations in Germany and Europe continue a life of dignity and an international order that respects the sovereignty of States (Article 2 paragraph 1 UN Charter) and the opportunity for the full realization of universal human rights (Article 28 Allgem. Declaration of Human Rights) to protect workers, and supports, can experience and enjoy.
politicians to throw the self-proclaimed "systemically important" banks all behind, rather than disentangling the banks until they are small enough to jeopardize the economic and political system will not, politicians who hear more on the mighty-most important bankers and corporations, as to the constitutional order and the universal human rights, gehören nicht ins Parlament.
V.i.S.d.P:
Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing, Thorner Str. 7, 42283 Wuppertal, 0202 / 2502621
Links:
Ankündigung der Verfassungsbeschwerde vom 20.05.2010
Normalerweise ist IWF-Recht ganz normales Völkerrecht und damit gleichrangig mit den meisten anderen internationalen Verträgen. 
