Wednesday, September 15, 2010

How To Disable Fortiquard?

lowering of living standards for recipients of SGB II benefits?

Ă„hnliches war zuletzt immer wieder der Presse zu entnehmen, exemplarisch etwa der  Focus-Online-Ausgabe vom 23.07.2010.  Was steckt tatsächlich dahinter ? Die Bundesregierung hat nun  am 23.08.2010  eine  small request of the Group of the Left from 08/04/2010 answered. Accordingly, it is not provided, such as the appropriateness of the size of homes to reduce a sole surviving beneficiary of about 45 sq. ft. to about 25, or the size of homes, depending on the number of people of a community of need rigidly defined. Rather, in line with the jurisprudence of the Federal Social Court, the accommodation costs remain to the local characteristics of housing markets addressed. Scale are the conditions of the lower standards of the respective housing markets. A similar advisory draft is planned for this autumn, so that could replace the regulations in force on the 01.01.2011. After that, it is likely planned to introduce a statute authorizing the municipalities through which local councils can make the regionally appropriate accommodation and heating costs known. In Book II and the exporting country's laws should only be the legal framework.

Julia Roberts In Poka Dots

1, 2 or 3 the next one - or why nonsense by repetition is not better ....

Already on 01/03/2010, this blog has dealt extensively with the proposal of Minister von der Leyen, to do away with the term "Hartz IV". Even then urged that this idea is not only practical, extremely doubtful, but in the Moreover, legal nonsense. One would have thought that the Minister from the experts from their communities would have been noted. That does not seem to have been the case because, as now, from an article in the World Social refer to is, is now a "new" concept to be anchored in Book II. Then inevitably the question arises, however, where should it be related to the "old" concept in the law. "Hartz IV" will be there looking in vain anyway. Moreover, one must have serious doubts whether the general language can be changed by law. At best, Mr. Hartz would have no objection to his name, the negative tone is to be taken ...

If interested in the factual background to "Hartz IV" was reprinted on the local post office from 01.03.2010 ( 1, 2 or 3 - or like a child his name was ) referenced.