Document procedure: AG Bad Schwalbach against Michael Wimmer Berger Sham judgments and document procedure failed as an integral part of an "unfair" procedure of Article 3, Article 6 and Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and to further international law (cf. also Ipsen Constitutional Law II, RN 61 +65 model / Creifelds 2000.332 et seq, UN Resulotion 217 A (III), Charter of Paris. see a. Palandt to gross violations of § 839 BGB)
sham and sham procedures are in principle judgments serious violations of § § 6 (1) Sections 2 and 3 and § 7 of the International Criminal Code (CCIL), because this kind of heavy psychiatrization the victims of the justice - That victims of state violence to judicial and law enforcement level - as torture measures under Article 2 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 10 evaluate December 1984 (Torture Convention), the CCIL but for the individual attacks but only if he is a member of CCIL in that group - for example, the NGO and the same interest "Ring provision".
In the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment regulates the individual complaints.
torture document procedure note procedure: AG Bad Schwalbach against Michael Wimmer Berger preliminary I quote from my blog "Broken
Rights . If you read this blog, one realizes that this is not one single document procedure but to the Inquisition
system Germany.
17:03:09:
okay, I have wirlich not great I feel like with this thing deal deeper, because I'm air »continue daily psychological torture including by the judiciary arranged and not look back that's what helps me most, so following this:
a joachim snackers, with the support of the judiciary poisoned my cat and I gave him curved to date, no hair. so I can support to witnesses, the court did not allow the bad in over five years Schwalbach, it relies ...
the court knows the course well, so got the snacks at that time as plaintiffs also asked lawyers in contrast to me.
Germany is now using for over five years to let this thing take me to my life ...
20:03:09:
before I of the next part: the proposed police reports again, I am now but this part of the judiciary and the cat killer describe in more detail:
the judiciary and the cat killer
end of 2002, I was out of the once again wrongly dismounted sentence dismissed. I looked for an apartment in Taunton / labor. shortly after I had moved to nisstete joachim snackers, who also had an apartment in the same house, a more or less me. He sat day and night with me in the apartment while I was working on pc. He had no friends or something similar. I noticed quite quickly that he acted as an informant now smaller, but I was actually much any more. However, I had to do something else. I helped out in a restaurant offered free of charge and set up an Internet cafe. meanwhile arrived at my apartment, I wanted to be alone sometimes. I had to bite the öffters approximately 4-5 clock in the morning but his request to go flat, I also must sleep sometime. not fit him at all.
I had a little cat, all the freedoms enjoyed what means they could come and go as and where they wanted
etc. I noticed that the animals with non-snackers had the hat, but he probably noticed that I the cat was significant.
evening when I came home, she was mostly already there, waiting for me or she was in the garden. when I called her from the patio door, she came immediately.
after I now more and more in the internet-cafe and restaurant to do, had limited daily contact be spied upon and look of the snack to a minimum. him it was wrong, that I also other "friends" and had a visit from a friend received from Koblenz, etc..
one evening I came home and my cat was not there. I called and searched her, but she was nowhere to be found. I also asked for my neighbors and thomas heike that liked my cat, and they left their well öffters Wonung after. But even there, she was not. she came the whole night not only the next afternoon she was back. two days later, the game repeats itself and another neighbor, Ruth sieve, in the upper floor of the house lived told me that the snackers with my cat she had visited. I am encouraged to, because now everything was clear and I think that the snackers had my cat at night locked up with him. the snackers was not at home, but then in the evening already. I walked through the garden on a ladder that we always use his balcony door and knocked. He opened the door. his apartment was cluttered with scrap metal and old computers. We were bunk bed before his self built that only a narrow had access, as the left and right, everything was obstructed with rubbish when I told him clearly said that his finger should leave cat of mine and when he again brings with him, we would have a problem. then he made me laugh a cheeky answer, something like that I could do about it eh nothing. then I grabbed the long miserable (he was not satisfied with very thin to thin and rather long bzw.gross) at its shirt and wanted to threaten him, nevertheless, before I could say anything he let himself like a wet sack and cried, help, help. He was lying on the floor and I had his shirt still in hand. I braked so well from his staged fall. I raised my hand and clenched his fist and said to others: if you Häll not the flap, cut I really. then he stopped and no more screaming. I ran in, and set out immediately from the spinner out away from the balcony door.
I wanted to go down the ladder when he came back and said that he's sorry and he handed me a small piece of hashish in the hand and said come on you a smoke. Ruth
sieve, which had its balcony and scream about it from his help- became attentive, listened from their balcony and got with it.
two days later I saw him with a bandage around his arm.
I counted together 1 and 1 and was told then by the ruth that the snackers told, I had hit him.
it was clear that the snackers are no longer with me came in the apartment. He was hardly seen.
I got a subpoena for the ag badschwalbach. I took a written statement of Ruth and another witness (an ex-officer), was also the roommate of the house with.
arrived at the court hearing, sat there a snack that also lived on Benefactor, with one, unlike me, the court assigned a lawyer. The judge threw me to have beaten before the snackers. what you just accused me and how I came to be not heard. I tried to presenti my presentation, but that was not possible. The judge and lawyer had nothing else to do than laugh at me and show me, that's what I say ule. schriftl. the message of the seventh ruth she would not accept my evidence and did not let them enter because they would not need him, she said. stupid farther to laugh I got up and said if I did not always right, then you can make the negotiations even without me and left. The officer got upset and went into the courtroom and told the judge that he ' and he had never seen here as a witness and therefore would be to say what would have ...
we went! I got a judicious interim with a disposal, an Indian, I got banned in the near the entrance door to get the snack. the violation of the preprinted penalty of 5000 € was painted by hand with the hand-written and 200.000 € for it.
few days later and struggled scheppte, my cat with me in my apartment and fell more or less to the ground before me. I called my neighbor Thomas, who brought my vet to katzte. but the vet could not help her. she died there. the snacks I saw the following day not more and I decided now Germany final to leave and called the judge had to bathe in and told her so with or, more precisely, I told her that I was going to leave Holland. she said that we would indeed live in a free Europe and not to the contrary would. I duly reported to the police from Taunton, and left as far as I can remember on 20/03/2004 19.oder the country. The following day I reported to the police in micht suffer / holland ... We now have 15 June 2010
To this day I am reminded daily of psychologically terrorized Germany and now also to physically amiss.
And now a few facts about this tyranny 
This is the arrest warrant. A Anklakeschrift I do not have access to the file and I will not be granted.
I hold: This act that springs from the imagination of sick lawyers, should take effect on 25th
June 2003 have taken place.
7 years ago In April 2004, immediately after my provoked by the German government and the court agreed to leave in Wiesbaden, West Germany issued two arrest warrants issued against me. A result of the alleged assault and the other alleged grounds of residence determination.
I firmly believe: I am in the European Union have been consistently reported to the police and the present Zeipunk'm still in Spain and then reported to the police in Germany.
If the assault would agree that it does not then it would be barred under 5 years. Furthermore, I would have got from top awarded to a public defender.
The facts are quite different: 
I firmly believe: The plaintiffs, the welfare derived by a government-funded Rechtsanwaeltin is approved. This we have handled in the same thing even before over 6 years now. The accused, that is me, a rule of law guaranteed by the mandatory defense denied.
Ich zitiere:
Weder die Schwerde der Tat noch die Schwierigkeit der Sach- und rechtslage lassen die Mitwirkung eines Verdeidigers geboten erscheinen. Insbesondere ergibt sich angesichts des Zeitablaufs keine Straferwartung, die eine Beiordnung wegen Schwere der Tat begruendete. Wenn dieses nun so waere, dann frage ich mich was der Haftbefehl sollte.
Von dem ganzen Staatsterror gar nicht erst zu reden.
Uebrigens als ich Karfreitag diesen Jahres von dem Deutschen Zoll verhaftet wurde, nachdem die Schweizer Polizei mich auch sicher dort abgegeben hatte. Wurde mir der Pflichtverteidiger zugelassen. Den durfte ich dann auch am 5. Tag der Haft anrufen.
Ich kam "frei" und verpflichtete mich in Deutschland zu bleiben.
Now I pursued since Easter of this terrorist state and its little abortion at every turn and terrorized. This dirty work had in the past 7 years, the Dutchman, do the French, English, Portuguese and even the Swiss.
this ZIP letter I received from my now public defender even though he knew I wanted to see the document:
time passes - is now the 16th June 2010 Yesterday I had phoned my "lawyer" and explains the tips, after they had said to me that the RA is in the conversation and I would be recalled that I was not on the court, on the 23rd of June set appear to be going, I consider this trial as inadmissible. Today
called me back and the RA refused a corresponding letter with performances of the corresponding end section of the court or competent judges write.
the contrary, he threatened me so that I would be arrested, as was the case a few years ago when I the court in writing informing him that I would have learned myself from criminals away and therefore will not appear voluntarily to the court would.
thus ending the talk of the RA.
time goes by - today is 23 June 2010 As it stands now I am represented by a different Rechtsanwaeltin.
When she called yesterday on the court, they told her that the hearing does not occur, at least not today. This I learned
then from the Rechtsanwaeltin who called me then. The court told me not to ...
time passes and the wickedness of the German government continues to develop.
note procedure: LG Wiesbaden against Michael Wimmer Berger
I received the following letter from the AG Bad Schwalbach:
So the mock trials of the terrorist-GmbH-Germany will now take place on the LG in Wiesbaden.
A charge of LG, as I heard the opinion also, I did not get to this day. Meanwhile bekam ich zwei weitere Strafanzeigen, natuerlich wegen Gewaltdelikten, - um der Linie treu zu bleiben.
Tatsache ist, dass ich keine Straftat begangen habe, weiterhin Staatsterror an mir vollstreckt wird und ich mehrfach von bewaffneter Polizei, die nun hier das Haus in dem ich terrorisiert werde oefter besucht, koerperlich bedroht wurde und einmal sogar attackiert wurde.
Die illegale Gerichtverhandlung soll nun am Donnerstag, den 19. August 2010 auf dem LG in Wiesbaden stattfinden...
Das Scheinverfahren vom 19.08.2010 auf dem LG in Wiesbaden Auf dem Gericht angekommen erfuhr ich, dass es eine Verhandlung des Amtsgerichts ist und nur aus technischen Gruenden auf dem LG stattfindet, da der Zeuge (bzw. Taeter) Monitor and afraid about being questioned.
I was represented by a lawyer (behind it) and I had already long been deprived of the authority.
I was not allowed to perform, so this method at all has no legality. I got 2
agenda prison or be fined 100 euros, during the procedure, as I said without being asked and also denounced the illegality of this procedure.
The criminal case in which I would if we live in a constitutional state, a witness and would have to be accused is the statute of limitation for a long time. I can prove it, but I also was not allowed.
The witnesses, who I stated before about 6.5 years at the same hearing on the AG Bad Schwalbach were not loaded and the written statement by the now deceased witness Ruth sieve is like a miracle from the court files have disappeared or these files were not consulted on purpose.
Even the testimony of the true perpetrator was a great laugh and not (currently not more I would like to say that I would lift my blogs for the appeal hearing, to which anyone is welcome.
I was 8 months sentenced without parole, even though everyone knew in the courtroom that I am innocent. (as always - nothing new)
Until today I did not get a verdict, but the request on threat of arrest already (of course, not signed)
I can not even. the name the judge or the Staatsanwaltin know. Not until today. I mention no indictment, and access to the file altogether.
To be continued ...
